Charles county taxes

The women must pay d'.impôts less. Enter the terms which you seek. Register with the daily letter of Rue89 Commentez the articles of Rue89 in video with your webcam. Torn around l'.île Seguin, the line despairs Billancourt Pau plays l'.ouverture: everyone discharges everyone Rheims: the "serene" PS among the payments of accounts with UMP Philippe Torreton works his role of candidate for Paris Municipales: the Greens, a threatened species Sarkozy, a "third season" to make forget the two others For the PEN, Sophie Marceau does not n'.aurait "the very clean nose" Small commune désespérement seeks candidate At Carlyle, a Sarkozy can in hiding another L'.ex-aviseur of the customs makes the head office of Bercy. You can propose a corrigendum in this article. The women must pay d'.impôts less. Two Italian economists propose to make them pay less than the men to incite them to work more. To make pay the men to make work the women. It is the progressive idea by two Italian economists, Alberto Alesina and Andrea Ichino in a platform published in April by: it is time to adopt a different tax rate according to whether income tax is paid by a man or a woman. The objective: a greater incentive to work for the women. A polemical measurement, which could feed the debates of the third edition of Women' S Forum for Economy and Society. Controlled by the Frenchwoman Aude Zieseniss de Thuin, this gathering of more than 1.000 participants of 65 countries "a Davos with female wants to be", where the essence of the public of Davos is precisely male. A mechanism which reconciles liberal and in favour of the intervention of the State. And have fun to reconcile - one moment holding them of a voluntarist intervention of the State with an aim of facilitating female employment. and those of a liberalism good dye which would plead in favour of a fall of the taxation. In the translation of their article of Financial Times published by International Mail, the two researchers assert redistributive virtues of their thesis: "it Would be unjust that the tax department differently treats the men and the women. "There is already a whole testing battery which does not apply to the two sexes. We could eliminate some much while choosing a simple differentiation from the scales from imposition. For them, a tax incentive would function insofar as the rate of employment of women in Europe is still lower than 60%. But, in full time equivalent, the rate is in fact differently low: many women work indeed part-time, whether it is undergone or chosen. What has an impact on the evolution of their career. That one is man or woman, white or black, Jew or catholic is thus indifferent in comparison with the income tax return. Thus, Gilles Saint-Paul, professor of economy in Toulouse, refuses "saucissonner" the taxpayers by groups: A more realistic measurement: the introduction of a separate income tax return These last years, the networks of women senior executive or heads of undertaking multiplied, a company of council to the companies on the topic of the co-education, which incorporates several networks of businesswomen. It claims more projections on the face of inciting measurements. Initially, it claims especially the introduction of an income tax return separated in the couple. Domenica Méda, sociologist specialist in the employment of women and former adviser of Royal Ségolène, consider "a little insane" the proposal of the two economists Italian. To support the guard of children for the 450.000 mothers without Joint author employment with Domenica Méda of the work "the Second Age of the emanicipation: the company, the women and employment ", the economist Helene Périvier is even more skeptic: "a specifically female taxation would be likely to be unconstitutional in France. Helene Périvier pleads for other reforms: the income tax return disjoined, but especially a reform of the modes of guard. For it "it is the genuine brake with female employment". It estimates that it would cost them 5 billion euros to per annum give on the labour market the 450.000 inactive French mothers while making keep their children. An activity which would generate, according to it, "a supplement of growth of about 1,6% of GDP". Without forgetting revenues from taxes moreover. By noting the comments for their relevance, you facilitate the reading of it. The least well noted they -even are folded up but can open of a click. To be able to comment on and note, thank you for. The comments are closed after seven days. It is in the 2 cases to create 2 categories of citizens, unequal in front of the law (here the tax law). But it is not surely that a "detail" as would say Francois Fillon. In any way such a law would be anticonstitutional and contrary with all the European laws. I do not see how one would retrogress, it is absurd. And then it is the door open to all the chicaneries. I see from here the chairman who will declare all his stock-options, these land incomes. Without counting that it will allot a fictitious station to him good placed in the company with large wages imposed low than his own wages. "Without counting that it will allot a fictitious station to him good placed in the company with large wages imposed low than its own wages. Ah because you believe that the post of chairman is not a fictitious station. Whereas the name of his wife is in the heading of the bank account on which the wages are transfered, what that changes. To incite them to work more. The goal of the play is it to work always more. - and with all those which would like to be it. But one did not see man yet to nurse, and I think that the all small ones need more their mother.) much more interesting than to hold a case of super market or to progress in a company to absurd and destroying operation. Not, not, I am not a petinist, nor lepeniste.je am for justice, against racism, the exploitation of the man by homme.mais stop trying to make us believe that the cribs, it is freedom. It would be possible surely other to be free if one thought of it, not. Me I find rather than it is a good idea, but I find that work is made only with half, why that women. It is necessary to also lower the taxes for the men to be right and so that the men are not not discriminated. Such a step for insiter the women to work more is rather doubtful. The women who do not work in my opinion make it by the chance of the life (children, house to be occupied, disease, food to be prepared, etc. One does not have to occupy oneself of that nor with the insiter to work or remain at the house. The women know what they must do. For a teacher of history-géo, it seems to to me that you miss a little retreat First of all you confuse chance and need. That it is necessary to be occupied of the children, of the house, of food is not a chance but comes or of a biological or social need (absence of mode of guard). The fact that it is the woman who occupies herself some mainly is perhaps related to a chance of the evolution of our companies. But to in no case an individual chance. "the women know what they must do". They have still well evil to take part in the domestic tasks (mea culpa, I am one). Lastly, a point which would deserve to be mentioned: since when the employees have the choice of their working time. The economists systematically reason starting from the idea that each one can if it wishes it to convert time into money or vice versa (while working more or less). That does not hold the road vis-a-vis with reality: you already tried to negotiate one hour more or less with your employer. That it is thought that a tax incentive of the hearths will change the employment of women, it is anything. "Cherished, when you finish your hours sup, you will think of leaving the detergent. I am not sure that we all are gifted to make good mothers with the hearth. The great majority does what it can. Yes, the women know what they have to do: it would be necessary to see not to put to them too many sticks in the wheels. There are choices which are not: they find solutions, it is all. If these conditions were met the proposal of the Italian economists would become completely useless. And everyone is content, even the precepteur. they squatent already far too many "fundamental principles" in our companies, our organizations familliales and educational, until in the social, jurisdictional or administrative functions. it is not here question of machism but of balance. I think that there is necessary to begin there differently to encourage the women to work more or at least to remain active even after 2 or 3 children. While decreasing the tax of the women who work, those Ci will invest this nonversed money with the tax department in the guard of their children. It is thus still they which solve the problem of the guard of children. To tax the spouse, will give certainly the opportunity to him to reflect on its place near his/her children. How many men admit that they are not present enough on their premises but do not do especially anything so that that change.Eduquer children, requires a daily investment without anything to wait in return. if one the their paid standby time of the children and well they pâyeraient more tax than the men and gagneraent their life better that the men and I think that much man would not like as trade unionist I for am égalitée It would be necessary, for speaking "the women must they pay less impots", than the equality of wages man-woman,en France is effective then to propose with the medef a new subsidy to disguise, NOT and for what to make, unemployment drops, a mechanical fall, more departures than of arrived on the labour market and as what is rare, is dear the fear of MEDEF: that tomorrow it is obliged to pay our children what prohibited to us but with the systhematic delocalization of French industry and our children will be in the shit, with wages of bad cold the child, without hospitals, anything, a return to the years ZOLA and why: because their parents will not aurrons not done what is necessary, TO FIGHT so that at least, the future of the next generation is the same thing that they but the old men are without release as of 50 years. In here is an idea that it is good. "if one paid them the standby time of the children" Ah Ben, it would miss more than that, than one pays them for the guard of _ their _ children. Hé Ho, which it is which decided to do them these children, who did not ask anything. The minimum would be that they raise them, not, and correctly, please. If they do not want to keep them, free, that they do not make any. And there are sufficient unhappy on the ground, without it being necessary to add some. 50 percent woman 50 percent man. They manufactured it how their child andouille I hope that you have neither woman nor child with ideas like those. Street 89 does not have another thing to tell only this kind of information still-born child. And become transexuels of the women. To replace in the title "women" by another "whole" of anybody and see whether Ca shocks you. To test with Catholic, black, Jew. You are right it is inadmisible not to detect the cancer of the postate among women. Can you explain me what biologically differencie a Jew, of a catholic. The law is used to establish an equality which does not exist fact. Meg, it is true that the women often suffer from certain forms of discrimination in the world of work. and quote them extremely well to you. That known as I do not think that this idea, of the different taxes, can solve anything. And also a danger to income tax, which seems to be the only concerned one. Work to be made, it is indeed on a better valorization of the woman in work. It is more difficult, but it is the only means of arriving at a concrete result. Hold, the next time that you go in the dentist, thus throw an eye on the magazines feminins which trainent in the waiting room. Publicity must inform you about the state of mind of the readers. Afterwards, compare with the new observer. Digging in in the thatched cottages. Soon we will be able to work only with the authorization of the husband. How to dare to make such a proposal. I give little chances of survival to a couple where a woman would work without the approval of her husband. The suppression of the formal authorization does not change anything with the business. To restore the merit of clearness would have and would highlight that the marriage is always an alienation. The celibacy is legal, and relatively quite allowed: what prevents you. Nothing, it is well for that that I practise, and advises with each one to do as much of it. Heaps of naive people are let have, and realize too late. You see until where your reasoning can go. To restore this authorization of another age would oblige all the women who overcome this alienation to it to be subjected. Imagine a woman who works and who Marie: all-with-blow it should draw a feature on its life from single person with his prerogatives. I expensive do not give future of the marriage. To be avenged for a few millenia of patriarchate, instead of promoting the equality, one prefers to make feel guilty, punish, sanction, degrade, humiliate, degrade the men. At least in the mediocrity the women prove that they are our equal not but that does not go well not. "the feminism killed the woman has to want an equality which naturally is impossible" But the equality is a antinaturelle thing. It is natural that the fort puffs out the weak ones, the idea of equality it of is precisely exceeded nature. With the fact, you vote, you have a work, you have a banking account you made studies. Really these feminists which wound. Then "the woman" what it is. has share a uterus we do not have anything in common. "the woman" it is a discriminating concepte (you see a little like "the black" "the Jew".), a category which is useful has to determine the individues against their personnalitées and locked up in an arbitrary role. Then please let us kill the woman, the black, the Jew, Arabic and rather twice that one. As for that has which you answer, I does not include/understand well in what he makes feel guilty and panics so much with this business of taxes. Ca has the air of a disease, in all the cases they are rather alarming. If I etait quite nice I would advise a therapy well to him, but I am malicious then I advise anything. To be on a plan of equality with somebody, that does not want to say to be identical to this somebody. You seem to confuse the two concepts. As for equity, it is nothing other than a compromise intended to consolidate the established order. The equitable trade does not make peasants of Central America of the heads of undertaking, it just enables them to continue to plow their field. I nevertheless wonder, considering your first child made you become aware of your "inferiority", why you made other kids. Beyond the sexism, Stop wanting to pay less tax. You for better controlling beat the use of it, but really want you that all becomes private, the school, health, justice. A world without more any solidarity, or the rich person buys all and the poor one is nothing any more it is that modernity. The public utility must remain public. Notice that since that becomes private, it is more expensive and less better. Since the post office is partially deprived, the mail is not any more the priority but publicity. Since Air-France entrusted the treatment of the luggage, there are enormously flights. Bakery, it is made by the private one. I do not dare to imagine what that would be if bakery were made by the public. Conclude by yourself for the remainder. But there, I of insane, I do not play the lotto. As if to pay taxes dissuaded to work. On the contrary, to lower the taxes makes it possible to work less by keeping the same standard of living. The situation in Italy is completely different, it cannot be included/understood of a French observer which did not connait this country closely. Its statute to to some extent is recognized him. In France it is different, the mother has 2 years less per child, if it does not make of it that one they is 2 years and it is all. In Italy, the retirement for the women they is 5 years before the men, for all the women. That aims at preserving the role of the women, of the mothers, in the Italian company. It is not a question for them to be really incited to work contrary to what is known as here. So much about Italian women complain some, they are very far from being most numerous. if I understand well, once that this Italian woman is with the retirement (5 years earlier than a man), it makes some keeps gratos its grandchildren. It is true that it is practical for the State (not cribs to create etc). Always the same commonplaces on the cribs it is wearying in more Under pretext of modernity and of feminism, you prevail yourselves of a role of leader as regards education, but which rests on what exactly. In Italy, the social life is articulated on values which you ignore obviously. I commit you to revise your judgement because it misses base, and even I find it sectarian racist limit. Each people, each nation have the right to preserve a way of living which is clean for him and which succeeded to him. In France, the old men one release them with the old people's home as soon as they dribble a little. In Italy, it is not rare to see with the same table 4 generations, sometimes 5. And even in this industrial North that each one proposes as if it were with any force to disunite family values. There is no shame for a woman to be devoted to her family, or her work if that is appropriate to him. Each one saw as he wants it, and the Italian State encourages to preserve family fabric. Is necessary it to see throwing stones to him because they does not build cribs. Making, by not doing it, it makes it possible several generations to continue to know. I find you narrow spirit but that makes me smile. It is what this comment old-fashioned and bienpensant truffé of rancid kindness puant of mould. "Each people, each nation have the right to preserve a way of living which is clean for him and which succeeded to him. It is a little like saying that in the name of the cultural relativism, the excision it is very well. that succeeded with what, with share to make million mutilated. Not but saw it to you where, your image of Epinal of the 4 or 5 generations with table at the day of today. Still more rantanplan that in the south, and it is not little to say birth rate low of the world. As opposed to what you seem to believe, it is not a failure, but a success. There are sufficient unhappy like that on ground. Moreover, you say it yourself, without you to give of it an account, there are too much old man and too many kids, of which torcher is needed the bottom. And generally they are the women who type this kind of job. In the absence of old people's home, one can test the euthanasie.A my opinion, it is not less obscene which the war. In the absence of cribs, one can abstain from making children. It is not those which will not have been done which will come to complain. Very few women have the occasion to carry out a career within the meaning of the appreciation for the company. I am a woman, and I do not make career, I never made career. I rose the morning to go to gain what to make boullir the pot and pay the rent. I pouffe of laughing in front of the counter-productive speech of the basic feminist. Although, feminist, is necessary to see, the mould broke 30 years ago, is not necessary to dream. When you say that all that counts it is the pay, want you to say "to gain much" or "to have wages". If your diplomas led you to have a good pay, then you already made career, would be this only by your studies. Yes, it keeps gratos its grandchildren, and in more it finds pleasure there. It is sure, that breaks the job of the nannies, but it is like that. Blow, the nannies are obliged prostituer or to be done build. Martin Hirsch: three billion for the RSA or the resignation Women roms: l'.accueil catastrophic of the hospitals the mayors make, in their turn, hunting for without-papers. Intermittent and "number d'.objet": what really will change RSA: Bayrou in obvious offence of lie the countryside of the local elections on Rue89 Campaigns of America, the blog of the US elections. -- Site carried out using free software (